Summary
Stephen King’s review for a new Netflix horror movie reveals why it is a streaming hit despite having a Rotten Tomatoes score of 64%. Since Stephen King has written over 60 novels in his writing career and is still consistently expanding his horror empire, he is obviously best known for his long line of work as an author and contributions to the horror genre. However, in recent years, the author has also gained some credibility as a movie critic, thanks to his viral social media reviews of popular movies and shows.
After a relatively obscure horror movie suddenly became a streaming hit, Stephen King, too, gave it a shot and took to Twitter to publicly share his opinions on it. AlthoughStephen King’s reaction to the Netflix filmbarely has two sentences, it perfectly captures why it is gaining so much traction. It also highlights the real reason the film deserves a sequel.
All 66 Stephen King Books Ranked From Worst To Best
Over the course of his literary career, Stephen King has crafted 66 novels and over 200 short stories, but how do his books rank against one another?
Stephen King Is Right About Why Under Paris Beats Other Recent Shark Horror Movies
Under Paris' Sense Of Realism Makes It More Terrifying Than Most Recent Shark Horror Films
As The King of Horror’s Twitter review suggests, he was initially under the impression thatUnder Pariswould be another “jokey movie” likeSharknado. Therefore, he did not expect it to deliver any genuine chills and thrills. However, when he finally watched it, he found it to be “quite good,” especially during its “last 25 minutes.” King’s review perfectly highlights whyUnder Parisbeats many recentkiller shark horror movies. In terms of overall quality, Netflix’sUnder Parismay not rank as high asSteven Spielberg’sJaws.
However, what makes it stand out among the sludge of shark horror films that have come out in recent years is thatit has some semblance of realism. AlthoughUnder Parisalso portrays over-the-top action scenes and adopts pseudoscientific ideas, it never seems as ridiculous as films likeOpen Water,The Meg, andMega Shark Versus Giant Octopus. It walks through some hilariously preposterous scenarios but balances them with realism by drawing on real scientific concepts like parthenogenesis and real-world ecological concerns.
Stephen King’s Stamp Of Approval Is Another Reason Under Paris 2 Must Happen
King’s Understanding Of Horror Storytelling Proves Under Paris Has Franchise Potential
Stephen King’s opinions about movies and shows may not always align with those of most viewers and critics. However, since he is The King of Horror, his reviews for horror films are often insightful and reflective of his deep understanding of the genre’s storytelling.Under Paris, too, may not have landed in every critic’s good book, but King’s positive review suggestsit has the potential to expand its lore in a positive direction with a sequel.
Given howUnder Paris' endingperfectly paves the way for a potential sequel, Netflix would be missing a major franchise opportunity if it does not releaseUnder Paris 2. The film also has a terrifying end credits sequence that allows it to expand its vision and raise the stakes for its central characters in a sequel movie. SinceUnder Parisis also seemingly driving good numbers on Netflix,Stephen King’s stamp of approval should encourage the streaming giant to seriously consider greenlightingUnder Paris 2.
Under Paris
Beneath the bustling streets of Paris lies a hidden world filled with ancient secrets and dark mysteries. A group of daring urban explorers sets out to uncover the truth buried within the city’s catacombs, only to find themselves facing a series of terrifying challenges. As they unravel the enigmatic past of Paris, they must confront their deepest fears to survive.
